Built for the companies doing the bidding

Tenders are published across many portals on their own schedules, and every one of them closes on a fixed date. A company that checks portals once a week will keep missing opportunities that opened and closed in between. Nobody decided not to bid. The tender simply went unseen.

The second problem is the paperwork. Even a straightforward bid asks for a technical proposal, a pricing schedule and compliance documents. For a team without a dedicated bid writer, that is the real reason a good opportunity goes unanswered: not the decision, the week it would cost.

• Watches tender feeds continuously rather than on the day someone remembers to look.
• Scores each tender against your sectors, region and company size, so the list stays short enough to read.
• Drafts the response pack for anything worth bidding on, not just a link to go and read.
• Tracks the deadline on every match until it is submitted or it closes.

A draft is a starting point, never a submission. The agent writes the first version so that a person can spend their time on the parts that need judgement: the pricing, the feasibility, whether this contract is one worth winning.

Responsibility for what gets submitted stays with the company doing the submitting. That is deliberate, and it is why every match arrives as something to review rather than something to send.

An account is tied to a company email domain, so one company gets one account and there is no seat management to administer. A single representative can run the whole pipeline, from the first match through to submission.

Every new account starts with a 3-day free trial. If you want the specifics of how one company is kept separate from another, that is written up on the security page.